Pretty stupid for a smart guy...

Eric G. Harrison's blog

My Links

Blog Stats

Archives

Post Categories

Image Galleries

Blogs

Friends

Programming Resources

Software Companies

Another class action lawsuit with no benefit to the 'victims'

I received an announcement that I am a member of a class in a class action lawsuit against AT&T Wireless.  I've taken to reading the details of these mailers (it seems I get one every couple of months) just to see how the lawyers and the 'victims' are making out.

In this case, it seems that under certain circumstances, if you cancelled your AT&T Wireless service, they charged you through the whole month, rather than stopping on the day you cancelled the service.  So, for someone who had a plan like mine, that could be a $70 or so overcharge.  I'm sure that on average, the charge is much less, but you understand my point.

Since these lawyers have gone to bat for me, you'd think I'm looking forward to my huge reimbursement check, maybe I could buy some friends some beers with it or something.  Alas, no.  My reimbursement is either a 50 or 100 minute long distance calling card (non transferrable) - retail value, maybe $10 - actual cost to AT&T Wireless - zilch + $.01.

Um, yeah.  When was the last time someone with a cell phone with a billion 'free' minutes bothered to use a calling card anyway?

Well, surely the lawyers will enjoy their 100 minute callings cards, right?  Alas, again, no.  The are not receiving the very valuable calling cards that are just compensation to those of us victimized by the ruthless AT&T Wireless company.  Rather they are nobly receiving $2.1 million dollars for a few months worth of work, and even that wasn't full time, I'm sure.  Even if it was 5 lawyers full time for 2 months, that's about 3200 hours of time, that's about $650 per hour.  Not bad work if you can get it.  And realistically, it was probably a lawyer and an assistant, with about 100 hours of work total (it's not that hard to make a boilerplate lawsuit), equalling $21,000 per hour.

I think the first step in lawsuit reform would be to pass a law that says that a lawyer cannot receive more than (say) 100 times the amount that an individual victim will receive from a settlement.  Of course, given that most lawmakers are in the pockets of lawyers (or former lawyers themselves), we know that will never happen.  In this case, they could use their 10,000 free long distance minutes to shop around for other victims.  How about those people sick of ads everywhere - there's got to be some money in solving a real problem like that!

Thank goodness those lawyers are out there protecting us from being ripped off. 

posted on Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:43 PM

Feedback

# re: Another class action lawsuit with no benefit to the 'victims' 5/15/2005 5:30 PM Shannon J Hager

I heard an interview with someone pushing for a law that would limit class action lawsuit payments to lawyers by tying the payments to the actual amount of redeemed rewards instead of the theoretic amount that the defendant pays.

What this means is that instead of getting paid based on the maximum amount that AT&T could pay, they would only get paid based on the total number of those long distance cards they actually gave out. Like you said, nobody wants those cards and most people won't take them. Right now that means that AT&T is basically ONLY paying the lawyers because nobody takes them up on the BS settlement. If that law was put into effect, the class action lawyers would have to get a real settlement for the victims instead of the useless smoke and mirrors you mention above.

In general, I want fewer laws and no new ones, but I think a change would be good in this case.

# re: Another class action lawsuit with no benefit to the 'victims' 5/16/2005 8:44 AM Eric G. Harrison

That sounds like a good plan Shannon! Unfortunately, we all know that just won't happen. After all, it would take lawyers to get it done, and they won't ever do it...

# great blog 1/25/2007 4:27 AM great blog

# 2006+april+casino+new+online 2/26/2007 5:57 PM 2006+april+casino+new+online

# bluff+casino+council+horseshoe+ia 2/28/2007 5:50 AM bluff+casino+council+horseshoe+ia

# foxwoods+casino+package 3/6/2007 2:02 PM foxwoods+casino+package

Title  
Name  
Url
Comments   
Protected by Clearscreen.SharpHIPEnter the code you see: